I was at least able to coast out of traffic.
So many parts for such a tiny engine!
So many parts for such a tiny engine!
What was so wrong with having foolproof way to set engine timing regardless of component wear? Whoever came up with belt timing, and every other engineer to embrace it since, deserves a flat tire every month for the rest of their lives. It's not the worst thing on earth, but it fucking sucks.I agree timing belts suck.
Of course the reason was to cut production costs and bring in more business to the shop bays. Manufacturer contracted cost of timing belts was probably something like $4. each vs. $20 for a chain. I guess they thought the average consumer would rather pay $1000. every few years to replace a rubber belt than pay an extra $16. when buying the car. My mom has a Husqvarna riding mover and the blades have to be timed to keep them from hitting one another. Last year the belt broke on it, The cheapest I could find the belt was on eBay for $50. If it had been a regular V belt I could have probably got it on eBay for around $10 or locally for $20.Whoever came up with belt timing, and every other engineer to embrace it since, deserves a flat tire every month for the rest of their lives.
I'll take a timing belt over the chains in some of today's engines. GM's 3.6L engine routinely need new chains before 100,000 miles and that's a $2500 job at the dealer with 3 chains and a dozen tensioners and guides that are replaced.What was so wrong with having foolproof way to set engine timing regardless of component wear? Whoever came up with belt timing, and every other engineer to embrace it since, deserves a flat tire every month for the rest of their lives. It's not the worst thing on earth, but it fucking sucks.