Just curious, I have the 9lb flywheel and was wondering if the DX/B6 crank would be too much of a rotating mass weight reduction? Meaning would driveability suffer? Reverse starts are more tricky with the light flywheel alone.Bomdoutscort said:You could also use a protege dx crank, it is lighter and will rotate faster, lightweight flywheel, Run higher octane, take your timing to 16* or higher, do the exhaust cam swap if you understand it, adjustable cam gears, Port and polish, port match head and intake manifold, rx7 vaf, and 2.25 exhaust. Thats all i can think of right now.
Yes, but to do a N/A or turbo build right, one would want to freshen up the block anyway. Both starting from the same point, turbo is much more expensive and yes quite a bit faster.as per a former quote i saw on here. N/A is the expensive way to go slow.
YOu could do it cheap. Really cheap if you know how to search. A bp26 manifold, vj11, mx6 gt injectors intercooler from craigslist, a piping kit and bov, A pro dx coolant pipe, a gtx oil feed, banjo bolt and tap the pan and your boosted. Spend another 150 for a gtx ecu and your straight.LOWETGT said:Just curious, I have the 9lb flywheel and was wondering if the DX/B6 crank would be too much of a rotating mass weight reduction? Meaning would driveability suffer? Reverse starts are more tricky with the light flywheel alone.Bomdoutscort said:You could also use a protege dx crank, it is lighter and will rotate faster, lightweight flywheel, Run higher octane, take your timing to 16* or higher, do the exhaust cam swap if you understand it, adjustable cam gears, Port and polish, port match head and intake manifold, rx7 vaf, and 2.25 exhaust. Thats all i can think of right now.
Yes, but to do a N/A or turbo build right, one would want to freshen up the block anyway. Both starting from the same point, turbo is much more expensive and yes quite a bit faster.as per a former quote i saw on here. N/A is the expensive way to go slow.